WardsANC 3No resultdarker = bigger win

Dashed: 2006 Ward 9 (2006 boundary) · Outlined: the 2004 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

1994199920042009201420192024

2006 Ward 9, MOSHAWENG in 2004 ?

No 2004 ward has the same boundary. These 2004 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 11

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Ward figures are the sum of the IEC's voting-district results for each ward (the IEC does not publish national/provincial results per ward).

Note: ward 1: IEC TotalValidVotes 272 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 271).

Note: ward 1: provincial ANC: computed 84.133% vs IEC 83.823529412%.

Note: ward 1: provincial UCDP: computed 14.022% vs IEC 13.970588235%.

Note: ward 1: IEC TotalValidVotes 1384 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 1383).

Note: ward 1: provincial ANC: computed 81.562% vs IEC 81.502890173%.

Note: ward 1: provincial UCDP: computed 15.907% vs IEC 15.895953757%.

Note: ward 1: IEC TotalValidVotes 324 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 322).

Note: ward 1: provincial ANC: computed 81.677% vs IEC 81.172839506%.

Note: ward 1: provincial UCDP: computed 16.149% vs IEC 16.049382716%.

Note: ward 2: IEC TotalValidVotes 984 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 980).

Note: ward 2: provincial ANC: computed 91.531% vs IEC 91.158536585%.

Note: ward 2: provincial UCDP: computed 5.816% vs IEC 5.792682927%.

Note: ward 3: IEC TotalValidVotes 456 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 455).

Note: ward 3: provincial ANC: computed 92.967% vs IEC 92.763157895%.

Note: ward 3: IEC TotalValidVotes 364 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 362).

Note: ward 3: provincial ANC: computed 87.293% vs IEC 86.813186813%.

Note: ward 3: provincial UCDP: computed 11.602% vs IEC 11.538461538%.

Note: ward 4: IEC TotalValidVotes 665 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 663).

Note: ward 4: provincial ANC: computed 79.487% vs IEC 79.248120301%.

Note: ward 4: provincial UCDP: computed 15.234% vs IEC 15.187969925%.

Note: ward 4: IEC TotalValidVotes 839 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 838).

Note: ward 4: provincial ANC: computed 80.072% vs IEC 79.976162098%.

Note: ward 4: provincial UCDP: computed 17.064% vs IEC 17.044100119%.

Note: ward 4: IEC TotalValidVotes 900 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 898).

Note: ward 4: provincial ANC: computed 89.198% vs IEC 89%.

Note: ward 4: provincial UCDP: computed 8.909% vs IEC 8.888888889%.

Note: ward 4: IEC TotalValidVotes 590 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 589).

Note: ward 4: provincial ANC: computed 56.197% vs IEC 56.101694915%.

Note: ward 4: provincial UCDP: computed 40.747% vs IEC 40.677966102%.

Note: ward 6: IEC TotalValidVotes 1327 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 1326).

Note: ward 6: provincial ANC: computed 83.333% vs IEC 83.270535041%.

Note: ward 6: provincial UCDP: computed 15.008% vs IEC 14.996232102%.

Note: ward 6: IEC TotalValidVotes 1128 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 1126).

Note: ward 6: provincial ANC: computed 74.956% vs IEC 74.822695035%.

Note: ward 6: provincial UCDP: computed 23.179% vs IEC 23.138297872%.

Note: ward 8: IEC TotalValidVotes 515 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 514).

Note: ward 8: provincial ANC: computed 91.440% vs IEC 91.262135922%.

Note: ward 8: provincial UCDP: computed 6.226% vs IEC 6.213592233%.

Note: ward 8: IEC TotalValidVotes 1614 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 1611).

Note: ward 8: provincial ANC: computed 92.365% vs IEC 92.19330855%.

Note: ward 8: provincial UCDP: computed 6.021% vs IEC 6.009913259%.

Note: ward 9: IEC TotalValidVotes 486 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 485).

Note: ward 9: provincial ANC: computed 75.258% vs IEC 75.102880658%.

Note: ward 9: provincial UCDP: computed 20.825% vs IEC 20.781893004%.

Note: ward 10: IEC TotalValidVotes 795 matches no ballot's party sum (provincial 783).

Note: ward 10: provincial ANC: computed 81.865% vs IEC 80.628930818%.

Note: ward 10: provincial UCDP: computed 9.195% vs IEC 9.056603774%.

Note: ward 10: provincial IFP: computed 2.171% vs IEC 2.13836478%.

Note: ward 10: provincial DA: computed 2.171% vs IEC 2.13836478%.

Note: ward 10: provincial AZAPO: computed 1.405% vs IEC 1.383647799%.

Note: ward 10: provincial UDM: computed 1.149% vs IEC 1.132075472%.

Note: ward 10: provincial NNP: computed 1.022% vs IEC 1.006289308%.

Note: ward 10: provincial ACDP: computed 0.766% vs IEC 0.754716981%.

Note: MOSHAWENG provincial ballot: 8 of 11 wards show no result (see their notes), so the ward sums are not compared with the IEC municipal total.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 29 Oct 2026, 14:37 SAST.